Construction of discrete series for classical p-adic groups
By Colette Mœglin, Marko Tadic. 2002
178 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0a337a162e5666d103e9438f2b18f49068edff2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Algebra and Number Theory
In Geometry and Topology
In Mathematical Physics
Citations in the corpus
- On Mœglin's Parametrization of Arthur Packets for p-adic Quasisplit Sp (N) and SO(N) (2015, methodology): “ct approach. So instead, we will follow [Mœg06b] to construct systematically a class of representations which generalizes the construction of discrete series representations of Mœglin and Tadi´c (see [MT02] and also [Xu15], Section 10). This class of representations will form the candidates for elem”
- Classification et changement de base pour les séries discrètes des groupes unitaires p-adiques (2006, background): “Ceci prouve les hypothèses de base utilisées dans [13] et [14].”
- On the generic unitary dual of quasisplit classical groups (2004, background): “In particular, the square-integrable, tempered, and generic representations, as well as the reducibility points of generalized principal series were classified, under certain assumptions, in terms of supercuspidal representations [6, 7, 16, 19].”
- On First Occurrence in the Local Theta Correspondence (2004, methodology): “In the nonarchimedean case, there is work of Muiç, [14], who proves the conservation relation for discrete series representations π ∈ Irrds(G′n) in the case of even parity, using the work of Moeglin and Tadic [12].”
- Paquets stables des séries discrètes accessibles par endoscopie tordue; leur paramètre de Langlands (2012, background): “…`a cet endroit par commodit´e mais on d´emontre finalement (en 7.2) que l’on n’a en fait pas chang´e la d´efinition originelle de [19] et [23] On montre aussi facilement que si π et π ′ sont des s´eries discr`etes du groupe classique telle que π st n’est pas orthogonal `a π ′ st alors π…”