Social norms and human cooperation.

By Ernst Fehr, Urs Fischbacher. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2004

1,527 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d097780d18ecec00a2389aa1632eebd194913e6d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Conformists and mavericks: the empirics of frequency-dependent cultural transmission (2008, background): “…how prosocial tendencies could have evolved in humans via cultural group selection (Boyd, Gintis, Bowles, & Richerson, 2003; Boyd & Richerson, 1982; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003, 2004; Fehr & Gaechter, 2002; Guererk, Irlenbusch, & Rockenback, 2006; Guzmán, RodríguezSickert, & Rowthorn, 2006; Henrich,…”
Reward, punishment, and cooperation: a meta-analysis. (2011, background): “…the effect of punishment during iterated dilemmas is not only due to learning principles but also due to processes related to group norms, generating expectations of group cooperation, and strategically developing reputations (e.g., Fehr & Fischbacher, 2004; Fehr, Fischbacher, & Gächter, 2002).”
Children's altruistic behavior in the dictator game (2007, background): “Individuals who obey social norms for altruistic behavior obtain rewards, whereas those who defy norms incur punishment even at a cost to those inflicting the punishment (for a review, see Fehr & Fischbacher, 2004).”
Consumers and their behavior: state of the art in behavioral science supporting use phase modeling in LCA and ecodesign (2016, background): “A rich theoretical and experimental literature exists that analyses human interaction in social situations and identifies important drivers of non-selfish behavior (Fehr and Fischbacher 2004).”
Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks (2009, background): “Indeed, many individuals are “conditional cooperators” who give more if others givemore andwhoare influenced in their interactionswithothers by what the others are doing during the interaction (33, 34).”
Monte Carlo Planning Method Estimates Planning Horizons during Interactive Social Exchange (2015, background): “, their degrees of envy or guilt [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], could well differ.”
For Members Only (2014, background): “In social exchanges, individuals typically expect cooperation and fair treatment from others (Fehr & Fischbacher, 2004; Tyler & Blader, 2000).”
Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much…or not enough: Exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators (2013, background): “Recent research hints that a way out of this seeming likability vs. competence dilemma for women is to frame a negotiation in terms of benefits to others.”