A classical introduction to modern number theory
By K. Ireland, M. Rosen. 1982
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jenny G. Fuselier
- Holly Swisher
- D. Venku Naidu
- D. Nikshych
- Shlomo Gelaki
- Ling Long
- Ravi Ramakrishna
- Alyson Deines
Citations in the corpus
- Centers of graded fusion categories (2009, methodology): “very a,b∈ A×, we have X x∈Z/pZ ξax2 = ( a p √ p, if p≡ 1(mod4), a p i √ p, if p≡ 3(mod4) and X (x 1,x 2)∈Z/pZ×Z/pZ ξax2 1−bx 2 2 = ab p p. Proof. The first assertion is well known, see for example [R]. The second assertion is an easy consequence of the first.CENTERS OF GRADED FUSION CATEGORIES 21 Us”
- Hypergeometric Functions over Finite Fields (2015, background): “4 of [44]) which says that the Gauss sum of g(A) over Fq and the Gauss sum g(Ar) over Fqr are related by”
- Elementary Number Theory (2008, background): “(For more on higher reciprocity, see [IR90].”
- Hypergeometric functions over F_p and relations to elliptic curves and modular forms (2008, methodology): “Using known formulas for a(E) in the case of curves with j-invariant 1728 (see Chapter 18 of [10]), one can show that a(E) = ±2a,±2b for all E appearing in (9).”