Chemical modification of biomass residues during hydrothermal carbonization – What makes the difference, temperature or feedstock?
By K. Wiedner, C. Naisse, C. Rumpel, A. Pozzi, P. Wieczorek, B. Glaser. 2013
200 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Geochemistry and Petrology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d07a6a04f4765b81e870c91e5443eb1362b140e7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- D. Kalderis
- M. Kotti
- G. Gascó
- A. Méndez
Citations in the corpus
- Characterization of hydrochars produced by hydrothermal carbonization of rice husk (2014, methodology): “the experimental parameters (residence time, temperature, type of biomass) have been thoroughly described elsewhere (Sevilla and Fuertes, 2009; Jamari et al., 2012; Wahyudiono et al., 2012; Wiedner et al., 2013; Gao et al., 2013; Parshetti et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2013).”