Functional flower traits and their diversity drive pollinator visitation

By Felix Fornoff, Alexandra-Maria Klein, Florian Hartig, G. Benadi, C. Venjakob, Hans-Christian Schaefer, A. Ebeling. 2017

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0753436fcead0f29f4db6d7b412f2214253cfc0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. A. Armstrong
2. Hollie Blaydes
3. S. Potts
4. C. Gross
5. P. Maruyama
6. C. S. Souza
7. J. D. Whyatt
8. C. Kremen

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. S. Potts
2. P. Maruyama

In Plant Science

1. A. Armstrong
2. Hollie Blaydes
3. S. Potts
4. C. Gross
5. P. Maruyama
6. C. S. Souza
7. J. D. Whyatt

Citations in the corpus

• Opportunities to enhance pollinator biodiversity in solar parks (2021, background): “Less evidence was recorded for other pollinator groups other than butterflies, although correlations between vegetation height and bumblebee [52] and hoverfly [70] species richness were documented and taller flowers generally attracted more insect visitors [153, 154].”
• Temporal variation in plant–pollinator networks from seasonal tropical environments: Higher specialization when resources are scarce (2018, methodology): “Whether season had significant effects on network indices was tested using a likelihood ratio test comparing the model with and without the fixed factor using the r package “car” (Fox & Weisberg, 2011).”