Plant Speciation

By Loren H. Rieseberg, John H. Willis. Science, 2007

1,667 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d04bc45c6a35e008f1655d595a2d48c614278ebc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Petr Pyšek
2. D. Richardson
3. R. Frankham
4. J. L. Le Roux
5. M. te Beest
6. C. Fenster
7. M. Byrne
8. K. Ralls

Citations in the corpus

• The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. (2012, background): “Ecological tolerance Whether or not polyploids have a broader ecological tolerance than diploids (Stebbins, 1950; Grant, 1981) remains controversial.”
• Comprehending crystalline β-carotene accumulation by comparing engineered cell models and the natural carotenoid-rich system of citrus (2011, unknown): “Since the middle of the last century, polyploidy has been widely recognized as an important mechanism of plant speciation (Stebbins, 1950; Grant, 1981; Soltis and Soltis, 2000).”
• The “Polyploid Hop”: Shifting Challenges and Opportunities Over the Evolutionary Lifespan of Genome Duplications (2018, background): “Extending this reasoning, we can expect higher rates of dysploidy among weedy invasives, due to both their propensity for selfing and their often faster cycling (e.g., Grant, 1981), which increases the probability of spurious recombinations (Mandáková and Lysak, 2018).”
• Genetic Diversity and Conservation Units: Dealing With the Species-Population Continuum in the Age of Genomics (2018, background): “This leads to the question: why not just name ESUs as subspecies? Subspecies have traditionally been defined and viewed by both botanists and zoologists as phenotypically distinct, allopatric sets of populations that may intergrade into each other at geographic boundaries (Mayr, 1942; Grant, 1981).”
• Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. (2009, background): “MADS protein – protein of Gnetales) have little evidence of polyploidy ( Grant, 1981 ; D. Soltis et al., 2005 ).”
• Polyploidy, reproductive biology, and Rosaceae: understanding evolution and making classifications (2007, unknown): “…latter group are the ones to which terms like ‘‘intermediate species’’ (Nelson-Jones et al. 2002), ‘‘apomictic biotypes’’ (Weber 1999), or ‘‘microspecies’’ (Grant 1981, Aldasoro et al. 1998, Aldasoro et al. 2004, Kalkman 2004) are applied, and they could be either relegated to synonymy, or to…”
• The optimal balance between sexual and asexual reproduction in variable environments: a systematic review (2016, background): “2013) (see Table 1) because sexual reproduction has the potential to produce genetic variations, which could increase the survivorship of the plants in the future (Grant 1981; Philbrick and Les 1996).”