Impact of ocean model resolution on CCSM climate simulations

By B. Kirtman, C. Bitz, Frank O. Bryan, W. Collins, John M. Dennis, N. Hearn, J. Kinter, R. Loft, C. Rousset, L. Siqueira and 3 more. Climate Dynamics, 2012

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Description and Results at High Resolution (2019, result): “This is in contrast to studies with other models, which found an improvement in westward extent (e.g., Kirtman et al., 2012; CALDWELL ET AL.”
Review of Tropical‐Extratropical Teleconnections on Intraseasonal Time Scales (2017, background): “…or methods provide compelling evidence that improvements in the representation of tropical convection and large-scale climate features can be achieved (Kirtman et al., 2012; Stan & Xu, 2014; Wang, Sobel, et al., 2016) and highlight the importance of adopting these models into the forecast systems.”
Climate model configurations of the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (ECMWF-IFS cycle 43r1) for HighResMIP (2018, background): “…Gent et al., 2010; Small et al., 2014), ENSO variability (Shaffrey et al., 2009; Delworth et al., 2012), ocean fronts and western boundary currents (Kirtman et al., 2012; Chas- signet and Xu, 2017), the representation of tropical cyclones (McClean et al., 2011), the nature of air–sea interaction…”
High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6 (2016, background): “However, given the wide range of climate sensitivity among the climate models and the small differences in the model response up to 2050 for different”