The Music USE (MUSE) Questionnaire: An Instrument to Measure Engagement in Music

By Tan-Chyuan Chin, Nikki S. Rickard. 2012

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Music, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d043ccc303d1417ada62570cd1cec4f4c6487a4a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Music

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Psychometric properties and heritability of a new online test for musicality, the Swedish Musical Discrimination Test (2014, unknown): “…pointed out that there are musicality tests that do not easily fit into either of these main traditions as they focus on musical engagement, motivation and interests rather than the cognitive capacity to process musical information as such, e.g. the Music Use Questionnaire (Chin & Rickard, 2012).”
Enhancing wellbeing: An emerging model of the adaptive functions of music listening (2016, background): “Listeners also report listening to music to increase focus and attention and for the cognitive stimulation associated with the analysis of complex compositions (Chamorro-Premuzic & Furnham, 2007; Chin & Rickard, 2012).”
Emotional outcomes of regulation strategies used during personal music listening: A mobile experience sampling study (2014, methodology): “The Music Use questionnaire (MUSE: Chin & Rickard, 2012) was used to obtain information about participants’ music background.”
The Musicality of Non-Musicians: An Index for Assessing Musical Sophistication in the General Population (2014, background): “Compared with the long history of musical aptitude tests, most self-report questionnaires for the assessment of musical behaviour are relatively recent [18–22].”
Individual Differences in Music Reward Experiences (2013, background): “In a recent study, Chin and Rickard (2012) developed a self-report questionnaire (MUSE) and identified five sources of individual differences in musical engagement: engaged production, cognitive regulation, mood regulation, physical (dance and exercise), and social uses of music.”
Emotion regulation strategy mediates both positive and negative relationships between music uses and well-being (2014, methodology): “This scale displays sound reliability with Cronbach’s alpha ranging from .78 to .87 (Chin & Rickard, 2012).”
Der Gold-MSI: Replikation und Validierung eines Fragebogeninstrumentes zur Messung Musikalischer Erfahrenheit anhand einer deutschen Stichprobe (2014, background): “Jedoch fehlt es bislang an Studien, die den Zusammenhang zwischen den SES-Variablen und den verschiedenen Facetten von Musikalität systematisch untersuchen, so wie es in dieser Studie möglich war.”