Newton-Krylov Algorithm for Aerodynamic Design Using the Navier-Stokes Equations
By M. Nemec, David W. Zingg. 2002
169 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d041fb1c5e964293a062a10370115b09ef51bcdd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- Joaquim R. Martins
- Gaetan K. W. Kenway
- Charles A. Mader
- Ping He
- O. Chernukhin
- Xiaocong Han
- David E. Keyes
- Stephan Schmidt
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Joaquim R. Martins
- Gaetan K. W. Kenway
- Xiaocong Han
- O. Chernukhin
- Charles A. Mader
- Ping He
- David E. Keyes
- David W. Zingg
Citations in the corpus
- An adaptive geometry parametrization for aerodynamic shape optimization (2014, methodology): “For a two-dimensional airfoil, an efficient NewtonKrylov flow solver was developed by Nemec and Zingg (2002) to solve the Reynoldsaveraged Navier-Stokes equations with the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model.”
- Effective adjoint approaches for computational fluid dynamics (2019, methodology): “Four numerical algorithms are implemented to converge the residual equations including a Runge–Kutta (RK) algorithm, a diagonalized-diagonally-dominant alternating direction implicit (D3ADI) algorithm [143], an approximate Newton–Krylov (ANK) algorithm [144], and a full Newton–Krylov (NK) algorithm ”
- Multimodality and Global Optimization in Aerodynamic Design (2013, methodology): “The discretized equations are solved using a Newton-Krylov approach [1].”
- Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov methods: a survey of approaches and applications (2004, background): “Other JFNK applications in compressible flow include [9,63,80,134,147].”
- Three-Dimensional Large-Scale Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Based on Shape Calculus (2013, background): “Although this approach is known to be applicable and well working, one is often forced into finite differencing for these terms [2,3].”