EXPERIMENTAL VENUE AND ESTIMATION OF INTERACTION STRENGTH

By David Skelly. 2002

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d02e194f3c54d01760a56937782bd387c4202dc8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

A decade of climate change experiments on marine organisms: procedures, patterns and problems (2012, background): “Consequently, ecological outcomes of selection and species interactions have been shown to differ fundamentally between highly controlled experiments and those with a greater similarity to natural conditions (Skelly, 2002; Van Doorslaer et al., 2010).”
Amphibian Contributions to Ecosystem Services (2014, background): “The results of small-scale studies do not always predict the effects at larger scales (Skelly and Kiesecker 2001; Skelly 2002).”
EFFECTS OF AN HERBICIDE AND AN INSECTICIDE ON POND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND PROCESSES (2005, background): “…numerous studies have documented the success of these experimental venues in predicting the effects of toxicants on higher levels of ecological organization (e.g., Larsen et al. 1986, Pontasch et al. 1989, Stay et al. 1989, Niederlehner et al. 1990, Pontasch and Cairns 1991, but see Skelly 2002).”
Amphibian species richness across environmental gradients (2007, background): “Our data also suggest that with the exception of those with fish, the effects of species interactions on species richness are more subtle and contingent than the strong sorting effects of these major environmental variables (Skelly 2002).”
Invasive Plant and Experimental Venue Affect Tadpole Performance (2006, unknown): “Investigations of invasive plant impacts need to carefully consider appropriate venues (Oksanen 2001; Petersen and Hastings 2001; Skelly and Kiesecker 2001; Skelly 2002).”
The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology (2004, background): “For example, Skelly (2002) has shown that amphibian demography is substantially different in natural ponds than in studies conducted in closed mesocosms that are meant to mimic these ponds.”
MEASUREMENT OF INTERACTION STRENGTH IN NATURE (2005, background): “For example, Skelly (2002) and Taylor et al. (2002) compared per capita interaction strengths between species in small-scale mesocosms and large-scale plots imbedded in natural ecosystems and found variation between experimental venues.”
Adaptive microevolutionary responses to simulated global warming in Simocephalus vetulus: a mesocosm study (2007, background): “, 2006), which mimic quite well the conditions in small, shallow lake ecosystems (Resetarits & Bernardo, 1998; Chalcraft et al., 2005).”
Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians (2004, background): “They engage situation-specific and scale-dependent effects (Levin 1992; Carpenter 1996; Skelly 2002).”
Carnivory and resource‐based niche differentiation in anuran larvae: implications for food web and experimental ecology (2009, background): “For example, a meta-analysis of over 50 studies and a subsequent empirical test indicated that the effects of interspecific competition were much stronger in mesocosms than in field enclosures, even when tadpole densities and spatial scale were held constant (Skelly & Kiesecker, 2001; Skelly, 2002).”