The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi--recent updates and future perspectives.
By Kessy Abarenkov, R. Henrik Nilsson, Karl-Henrik Larsson, I. Alexander, U. Eberhardt, S. Erland, K. Høiland, R. Kjøller, E. Larsson, T. Pennanen and 8 more. New Phytologist, 2010
1,822 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d01e2a2519e07fc6415cb93a98e8cbe4c3d38f8b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cell Biology
- K. D. Hyde
- Leho Tedersoo
- Matthew E. Smith
- Andy F. S. Taylor
- R. Lücking
- Asha J. Dissanayake
- R. Henrik Nilsson
- K. Peay
In Molecular Biology
- K. D. Hyde
- E. Mächler
- Noah Fierer
- M. Strickland
- S. Bates
- Leho Tedersoo
- Asha J. Dissanayake
- F. Altermatt
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Distinct soil microbial diversity under long-term organic and conventional farming (2014, methodology): “, 2011) and UNITE (Abarenkov et al., 2010) using the naive Bayesian classifier (Wang et al.”
- The legacy effect of cover crops on soil fungal populations in a cereal rotation (2016, background): “For many but not all fungal groups (Schoch et al., 2014), more reference sequences are available via GenBank and UNITE databases for the ITS region (Kõljalg et al., 2013; Schoch et al., 2014) than for other LSU and other loci.”
- Five simple guidelines for establishing basic authenticity and reliability of newly generated fungal ITS sequences. (2012, methodology): “The sequences in INSD and UNITE are often used as reference datasets to which newly generated (“query”) sequences are compared in pursuit of taxonomic and ecological annotation.”
- The online database MaarjAM reveals global and ecosystemic distribution patterns in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota). (2010, background): “In order to overcome these limitations, specialized curated databases are increasingly being compiled to provide high-quality sequences with complete and correct annotations, including a verified taxonomic identification (Kõljalg et al., 2005; Abarenkov et al., 2010).”
- Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities (2017, background): “…markers for prokaryotes (Cole et al., 2009), microbial eukaryotes (Guillou et al., 2013; Pruesse et al., 2007; Quast et al., 2012) and fungi (Abarenkov et al., 2010), meaning that microbial data sets can be analysed and taxonomic affiliations established are established in a straightforward…”
- Branching out: Towards a trait-based understanding of fungal ecology (2015, background): “A trait database could be linked to genetic barcodes (the choice of which has recently been agreed upon for fungi (K~oljalg et al., 2013; Schoch et al., 2012)), and integratedwith taxonomic databases such as UNITE andDEEMY for ectomycorrhizal fungi (Abarenkov et al., 2010; Agerer and Rambold, 2004).”