Coordination polymers, metal-organic frameworks and the need for terminology guidelines

By S. Batten, N. Champness, Xiongwei Chen, J. García‐Martínez, S. Kitagawa, L. Öhrström, M. O'Keeffe, M. P. Suh, J. Reedijk. 2012

488 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Inorganic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cffc36dcc0b9cc497d810cb83b69dd73ef545b9c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Inorganic Chemistry

1. L. Öhrström

In Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

1. L. Öhrström

Citations in the corpus

• Let’s Talk about MOFs—Topology and Terminology of Metal-Organic Frameworks and Why We Need Them (2015, background): “The more or less amicable arguments between the groups have been described and analyzed elsewhere [2,4], and did not reach the same magnitude as for example the controversy regarding gallium-gallium triple bonds in the late 1990s [5].”