Benchmarks for electronically excited states: CASPT2, CC2, CCSD, and CC3.
By M. Schreiber, Mario R Silva-Junior, S. Sauer, Walter Thiel. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2008
888 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cff6a8e287b07b4aa4efc256286a577f793a1091
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
In Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Citations in the corpus
- QUESTDB: A database of highly accurate excitation energies for the electronic structure community (2020, background): “For CCSD, this conclusion fits benchmark studies published by other groups [61, 210, 224–227].”
- Basis set effects on coupled cluster benchmarks of electronically excited states: CC3, CCSDR(3) and CC2 (2010, methodology): “derived [1] from linear response CC3 and multistate CASPT2 calculations as well”