Distance measures for point sets and their computation
By Thomas Eiter, Heikki Mannila. 1997
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Bharath K. Sriperumbudur
- Krikamol Muandet
- Arthur Gretton
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Barnab'as P'oczos
- Yoshua Bengio
- Zoltán Szabó
- Kenji Fukumizu
Citations in the corpus
- Learning Theory for Distribution Regression (2014, background): “There also exist other (semi)metric constructions on points sets (Eiter and Mannila, 1997; Ramon and Bruynooghe, 2001).”
- Data-driven structural priors for shape completion (2015, methodology): “As part parameters change the correspondences between points and parts (ESMD) and the notion of symmetric points (Esymm) change as well.”
- A polynomial time computable metric between point sets (2001, methodology): “Eiter andMannila [5] also discuss a family of Manhattan measures between sets which we can describe as instances of the following scheme: dβ(A,B) = min r∈mβ(A,B) d(r,A,B) where d(r,A,B) = ∑ (x,y)∈r d(x, y) + #(B \ r(A)) + #(A \ r−1(B)) 2 .”
- Using Semantic Roles to Improve Question Answering (2007, methodology): “Specifically, we model the interaction between all pairwise labeling decisions as a minimum weight bipartite edge cover problem (Eiter and Mannila, 1997; Cormen et al., 1990).”