Killing Me Softly: The Fetal Origins Hypothesis

By D. Almond, Janet Currie. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2011

1,663 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In the epidemiological literature, the fetal origins hypothesis associated with David J. Barker posits that chronic, degenerative conditions of adult health, including heart disease and type 2 diabetes, may be triggered by circumstance decades earlier, in utero nutrition in particular. Economists have expanded on this hypothesis, investigating a broader range of fetal shocks and circumstances and have found a wealth of later-life impacts on outcomes including test scores, educational attainment, and income, along with health. In the process, they have provided some of the most credible observational evidence in support of the hypothesis. The magnitude of the impacts is generally large. Thus, the fetal origins hypothesis has not only survived contact with economics, but has flourished.

Subfields: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cfe6fcee96135a30d400fc361260e64fb3417f4a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Obstetrics and Gynecology

  1. Yu‐Chin Hsu
  2. E. Oster
  3. Qingliang Fan
  4. Yichong Zhang
  5. Solomon Hsiang
  6. Robert P. Lieli
  7. Nicholas J. Sanders

In Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

  1. Solomon Hsiang
  2. Yu‐Chin Hsu
  3. Joshua Graff Zivin
  4. A. Sacker
  5. E. D. Bono
  6. Yvonne Kelly
  7. James Fenske
  8. E. Oster

Citations in the corpus