The Oxford handbook of political psychology

By D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, R. Jervis. 2013

703 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Building a Tower of Babel? Integrating Core Motivations and Features of Social Structure into the Political Psychology of Political Action (2016, background): “Brader and Marcus (2013) suggested recently that three distinct emotions really matter in U.S. politics: Anger, anxiety, and enthusiasm (see also Marcus, 2002; Valentino, Brader, Groenendyk, Gregorowicz, & Hutchings, 2011).”
Political Neuroscience: The Beginning of a Beautiful Friendship (2014, background): “All of these topics are well-known to political psychologists (e.g., Feldman, 2013; Huddy et al., 2013; Jost & Sidanius, 2004; McGuire, 1985, 1993; Sears et al., 2003; Taber & Lodge, 2006; Tetlock, 2007)—and yet the application of neuroscientific methods has breathed new life into each of them.”
Exposure to Violence, Ethos of Conflict, and Support for Compromise (2017, background): “Examining the different response patterns to symbolic and realistic threats (Berinsky, Crenshaw, and Mendelberg 2004; Duckitt 2003; Legge 1996), on both the personal and collective level, may shed more light on the relationship between threat perceptions and intergroup relations.”
Science Curiosity and Political Information Processing (2017, neutral): “Who is most vulnerable to the tendency to selectively attend to information in patterns that reflect their commitment to ideologically and like-defined groups, and who is the least vulnerable (Taber & Young, 2013)?”