How Working Memory and the Cerebellum Collaborate to Produce Creativity and Innovation
By L. Vandervert, Paul H. Schimpf, Hesheng Liu. 2007
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cfbb5a1010ccd7ad0a38c5c0abe9b09b6336d918
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Jeremy D. Schmahmann
- Giovanni Pezzulo
- Masao Ito
- L. Koziol
- D. Budding
- Narender Ramnani
- Patrizia Scibinetti
- Nicoletta Tocci
In Social Psychology
- Jeremy D. Schmahmann
- Giovanni Pezzulo
- Masao Ito
- L. Koziol
- D. Budding
- Narender Ramnani
- Caterina Pesce
- Keith Sawyer
Citations in the corpus
- The Cognitive Neuroscience of Creativity: A Critical Review (2011, background): “Future studies should examine the role of automatized routines in creativity; these are thought to be represented in the cerebellum (see Vandervert, Schimpf, & Liu, 2007 ).”
- Consensus Paper: The Cerebellum's Role in Movement and Cognition (2013, background): “[174] have suggested, the evolution of language would be most profitably studied as a direct adaptive extension of structured and sequential brain mechanisms which sub-serve cognitive”
- Motor Creativity and Creative Thinking in Children: The Diverging Role of Inhibition (2011, background): “Both conscious and unconscious control complementarily contribute to creative behavior and cognition (Vandervert et al., 2007).”
- Subcortical structures and cognition (2009, background): “Vandervert and colleagues have argued that the cerebellum’s ability to generate models and to automate cognitions are at the basis of what generates giftedness and child prodigy (Vandervert et al., 2007; Vandervert, 2007; Chavez-Eakle, 2007; Ito, 2007; Welling, 2007).”