A note on the Wolff potential estimate for solutions to elliptic equations involving measures
By R. Korte, Tuomo Kuusi. 2010
56 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cfab4d86c8bab8f581fc6de51a08fd707a7450b6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
- Giuseppe Mingione
- Tuomo Kuusi
- Yannick Sire
- Cristiana De Filippis
- Giampiero Palatucci
- T. Kilpeläinen
- Anna Tuhola-Kujanpää
- Matteo Cozzi
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Giuseppe Mingione
- Tuomo Kuusi
- Yannick Sire
- T. Kilpeläinen
- Anna Tuhola-Kujanpää
- Frank Duzaar
- Paolo Baroni
- Cristiana De Filippis
In Mathematical Physics
- Giuseppe Mingione
- Tuomo Kuusi
- Yannick Sire
- T. Kilpeläinen
- Anna Tuhola-Kujanpää
- Cristiana De Filippis
- Giampiero Palatucci
- Paolo Baroni
Citations in the corpus
- New perturbation methods for nonlinear parabolic problems (2012, background): “Such a result has been recently obtained in [21, 22] in the context of pointwise estimates via nonlinear potentials (see also the announcement in [23] and [20] for nonlinear potentials).”
- Nonlocal Equations with Measure Data (2014, background): “Summarizing the various contributions given in [32, 33, 45, 35, 37] we have that the pointwise estimate”
- Superharmonic functions are locally renormalized solutions (2011, background): “Recall also the two-sided Wolff potential estimate [22,24,32,39,40]: if u is a nonnegative A-superharmonic solution to (2.”
- Linear Potentials in Nonlinear Potential Theory (2013, background): “1 somehow unexpected is that, starting from the seminal papers of Kilpeläinen & Malý [18,19], with different approaches offered by Trudinger & Wang [38,39] (that also worked in the subelliptic setting, starting by the ideas in [37,36]) and Korte & Kuusi [20] and Duzaar & Mingione [9], it is a standa”
- The Wolff gradient bound for degenerate parabolic equations (2014, methodology): “Another interesting approach to (1.6) was later given by Trudinger & Wang in [40, 41] and Kuusi & Korte in [22].”