The chemistry and behaviour of antimony in the soil environment with comparisons to arsenic: a critical review.

By S. Wilson, P. Lockwood, P. Ashley, M. Tighe. Environmental Pollution, 2010

814 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf97135d87cf99e10f6a720e6d950344e780b323

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Chemistry

1. Shaoxian Song
2. Marisol Gallegos-García
3. Kardia Ramírez-Muñiz
4. D. Mohan
5. C. Pittman
6. K. Binnemans
7. Y. Ok
8. O. Güven

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. C. Pittman
2. D. Mohan
3. Xiaomin Dou
4. Xueqin Zhao
5. Xin Jin
6. Y. Ok
7. O. Güven
8. M. Nasef

In Pollution

1. D. Mohan
2. C. Pittman
3. Y. Ok

Citations in the corpus

• Antimonate and antimonite adsorption by a polyvinyl alcohol-stabilized granular adsorbent containing nanoscale zero-valent iron (2014, background): “It is used in a variety of industrial products including flame retardants, manufacture of semiconductors, catalysts for plastics synthesis, and alloys for ammunition [2].”
• Antimony Recovery from End-of-Life Products and Industrial Process Residues: A Critical Review (2016, background): “[178] and since this antimony is often very localized and difficult to access, it is not discussed here in detail.”
• Arsenic Removal from Water by Adsorption Using Iron Oxide Minerals as Adsorbents: A Review (2012, background): “The presence of other anionic components such as sulfate, chloride, or natural organic matters can also decrease sharply the arsenic removal efficiency by adsorption using iron oxide minerals as the adsorbent (Wilson et al. 2009).”