The X-ray nuclei of intermediate-redshift radio sources

By M. Hardcastle, D. Evans, Judith Croston. 2006

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present a Chandra and XMM-Newtonspectral analysis of the nuclei of the radio galaxies and radio-loud quasars from the 3CRR sample in the redshift range 0.1 < z < 0.5. In the range of radio luminosity sampled by these objects, mostly FRIIs, it has been clear for some time that a population of radio galaxies (‘low-excitation radio galaxies’) cannot easily participate in models that unify narrow-line radio galaxie s and broad-line objects. We show that low-excitation and narrow-line radio galaxies have systematically different nuclear Xray properties: while narrow-line radio galaxies universa lly show a heavily absorbed nuclear X-ray component, such a heavily absorbed component is rarely found in sources classed as low-excitation objects. Combining our data with the results of our earlier work on the z < 0.1 3CRR sources, we discuss the implications of this result for unified models, for the origins of mid-infrared emission from radio sources, and for the nature of the apparent FRI/FRII dichotomy in the X-ray. The lack of direct evidence for accretion-related X-ray emission in FRII LERGs leads us to argue that there is a strong possibility that some, or most, FRII LERGs accrete in a radiatively inefficient mode. However, our result s are also consistent with a model in which the accretion mode is the same for low- and high-excitation FRIIs, with the lower accretion luminosities in FRII LERGs attributed instead to more efficient radio luminosity production in those objects.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf958919dfc21675bcd79dca19c0e9ae17b7f3be

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. R. Hickox
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. R. Ivison
  5. I. Smail
  6. P. Hopkins
  7. R. Dav'e
  8. A. Koekemoer

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. I. Smail
  3. R. Ivison
  4. Judith Croston
  5. R. Hickox
  6. E. Treister
  7. P. Padovani
  8. Kevin Schawinski

Citations in the corpus