Trade reforms and wage inequality in Colombia

By O. Attanasio, P. Goldberg, Nina Pavcnik. 2004

269 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf81a36f6d9c1aa8b33745e0e7388f68c3b5cb60

Citations in the corpus

• Trade and Employment: Stylized Facts and Research Findings (2005, unknown): “In a related paper, Attanasio et al. (2004) examine the response of sectoral employment shares to trade liberalisation.”
• Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries (2007, unknown): “…et al. (1999), Pavcnik (2003); Mexico: Robertson (2004), Hanson (2004), Cragg and Eplebaum (1996); India: Kijima (2006), Topalova (2004a), Deaton and Dreze (2002); Colombia: Attanasio et al (2004); India: Kijima (2006), Topalova (2004a), Deaton and Dreze (2002); Hong-Kong: Hsieh and Woo (2005).”
• Trade and Inequality: From Theory to Estimation (2012, unknown): “…control for firm fixed effects and find a smaller contribution from worker observables towards overall 10Consistent with Attanasio, Goldberg, and Pavcnik (2004) and Menezes-Filho, Muendler, and Ramey (2008), we find an increase in the estimated returns to education and experience (tenure) in…”
• The Impact of Trade on Technology and Skill Upgrading Evidence from Argentina (2007, unknown): “In the first country, Attanasio et al. (2004) find no evidence of labor reallocation across sectors, and find that changes in skill premiums cannot be related to changes in tariffs across sectors. Feliciano (2001) finds similar results for Mexico, and Verhoogen (2004) reports employment shifts towar”
• Globalization and wage inequality: Evidence from urban China (2012, unknown): “The trend is aligned with similar trends in other developing countries such as India (Kijima, 2006) and Colombia (Orazio et al., 2004).”
• Trade, Quality Upgrading and Wage Inequality in the Mexican Manufacturing Sector: Theory and Evidence from an Exchange Rate Shock (2004, unknown): “…on Argentina; Blom et al (2001), Green et al (2001), and Pavcnik et al (2002) on Brazil; Robbins (1994), Gindling and Robbins (2001) and Beyer et al (1999) on Chile; Robbins (1996b) and Attanasio et al (2002) on Colombia; Robbins and Gindling (1996) and Gindling and Robbins (2001) on Costa Rica.”
• Trade Liberalization and Wage Inequality: Evidence from India (2008, unknown): “Various studies from other developing countries like Mexico and Colombia have found similar results (Revenga, 1997; Hanson and Harrison, 1999; Attanasio et al., 2004).”
• Trade Diversification, Income, and Growth: What Do We Know? (2013, unknown): “However, most of the empirical evidence goes the other way (see e.g. Arbache et al. (2004) for Brazil, Attanasio et al. (2004) for Colombia, Berman and Machin (2000) for 14 low- and middle-income countries, Gorg and Strobl (2002) for Ghana, Hanson and Harrison (1999) for Mexico, or Robbins and Gindl”
• Factor Immobility and Regional Impacts of Trade Liberalization Evidence on Poverty from India (2010, unknown): “Micro studies, focusing on a specific country, such as Attanasio et al., 2004 (Colombia), Currie and Harrison, 1997 (Morocco), also find little relationship between trade liberalization and intersectoral reallocation. Indeed, these studies show that adjustment occurred through changes in relative wa”
• Using Survey Data to Assess the Distributional Effects of Trade Policy (2003, unknown): “The paper investigates general equilibrium effects, thus extending the existing literature that studies trade liberalization with household data in partial equilibrium (Attanasio et al., 2004; Deaton, 1989; Edmonds and Pavcnik, 2005; Friedman and Levinsohn, 2002; Goldberg and Pavcnik, 2005).”
• Did Trade Liberalization Help Women? the Case of Mexico in the 1990s (2010, unknown): “These results stand in sharp contrast to Attanasio, Goldberg, and Pavcnik (2004) who find stable employment patterns across industries in Colombia and also Revenga (1997) and Hanson and Harrison (1999) who examine an earlier period in Mexico.”