Benchmarking Simulated Robotic Manipulation Through a Real World Dataset

By J. Collins, J. McVicar, Dave Wedlock, Ross Brown, David Howard, Jürgen Leitner. 2019

32 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present a benchmark to facilitate simulated manipulation; an attempt to overcome the obstacles of physical benchmarks through the distribution of a real world, ground truth dataset. Users are given various simulated manipulation tasks with assigned protocols having the objective of replicating the real world results of a recorded dataset. The benchmark comprises of a range of metrics used to characterise the successes of submitted environments whilst providing insight into their deficiencies. We apply our benchmark to two simulation environments, i.e., PyBullet and V-Rep, and publish the results. All materials required to benchmark an environment, including protocols and the dataset, can be found at the benchmarks’ website<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1"><sup>1</sup></xref><fn id="fn1"><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>[Online]. Available: <uri>https://research.csiro.au/robotics/manipulation-benchmark/</uri>.</p></fn>.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Control and Systems Engineering

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Andrew J. Davison
  2. Stephen James
  3. David Rovick Arrojo
  4. Zicong Ma
  5. Chelsea Finn
  6. Sergey Levine
  7. Michael Crawshaw
  8. Dieter Fox

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Stephen James
  2. David Rovick Arrojo
  3. Zicong Ma
  4. Andrew J. Davison
  5. Sergey Levine
  6. Daniel Cremers
  7. Chelsea Finn
  8. Luc Van Gool

In Control and Systems Engineering

  1. Andrew J. Davison
  2. Stephen James
  3. David Rovick Arrojo
  4. Zicong Ma
  5. Sergey Levine
  6. Dieter Fox
  7. Chelsea Finn
  8. Lucas Manuelli

Citations in the corpus