Evaluation of entity resolution approaches on real-world match problems
By Hanna Köpcke, Andreas Thor, Erhard Rahm. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2010
531 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Epidemiology, Management Science and Operations Research, Oral Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf6c8ce4ec5bbbae9be4b9076c41d49a8eaad7b3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Epidemiology
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Oral Surgery
Citations in the corpus
- A sample-and-clean framework for fast and accurate query processing on dirty data (2014, background): “For instance, an evaluation of the popular duplicate detection technique [9] shows that the matching phase takes on the order of minutes for a dataset of thousands of tuples [39].”
- CrowdER: Crowdsourcing Entity Resolution (2012, methodology): “learning-based technique. First, we computed a feature vector for each pair of records. For the Restaurant dataset, we chose two similarity functions, edit distance and cosine similarity , adopted by [18], and computed their values on four attributes to obtain a 8-dimensional feature vector; For the”
- Joint Entity Resolution (2012, background): “Most of the ER works [15] have focused on resolving one dataset.”
- Deep entity matching with pre-trained language models (2020, methodology): “We present the experiment results on benchmark datasets for EM: the ER Benchmark datasets [21], the Magellan datasets [20] and the WDC product data corpus [31].”
- Distributed Representations of Tuples for Entity Resolution (2017, methodology): “Our experimental setup was an adaptation of prior ER evaluations methods [31, 32, 47] to handle distributed representations.”
- Deep Learning for Entity Matching: A Design Space Exploration (2018, methodology): “The first 7 are smaller datasets from [15] except for "Amazon-Google" which is from [43].”
- Data Matching (2012, methodology): “recently discussed the issues related to evaluating data matching systems in more detail [169].”