Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments

By J. Palmer, Robin E. Hoffman. 2001

372 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf5a8f02fa42d9cba81216c772bc9c56b22977cb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. M. Tveit
2. G. Fry
3. Å. Ode
4. Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole
5. A. Stamps

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. G. Fry
2. M. Tveit
3. Å. Ode
4. Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole
5. A. Stamps
6. Yujia Zhai

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole
2. G. Fry
3. M. Tveit
4. A. Stamps
5. Å. Ode

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of Area, Height, Elongation, and Color on Perceived Spaciousness (2011, methodology): “The claim for validity of static color images versus on-site evaluations was based on 185 environments (Stamps, 2000, p. 103) and was subsequently replicated with 470 environments (Palmer & Hoffman, 2001, p. 155).”
• Representing climate change futures: a critique on the use of images for visual communication (2005, background): “Focus is moving toward the possibilities for using computer-generated visualisations encompassing more 'experiential' elements, giving viewers some degree of control to move around the visual field (Bell, 2001; Bishop, Ye, & Karadaglis, 2001; Danahy, 2001; Palmer & Hoffman, 2001).”
• Capturing Landscape Visual Character Using Indicators: Touching Base with Landscape Aesthetic Theory (2008, methodology): “It is difficult to capture the totality of a real landscape using photographs as discussed by Palmer and Hoffman (2001).”