Can scale and coefficient heterogeneity be separated in random coefficients models?

By Stephane Hess, John M. Rose. 2012

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf4e37f43b041b186bc8529017ad4ba6e810f111

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Correlation and scale in mixed logit models (2017, methodology): “…goal of estimating scale heterogeneity, and numerous published papers claim to have done so in empirical applications.1 However, as highlighted by Hess and Rose (2012), scale heterogeneity is not identified separately from other sources of heterogeneity, which means unfortunately that these…”
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future (2018, background): “However, it is important to mention that the generalised multinomial logit model should be used with caution since the ability of this model to capture scale heterogeneity has been questioned in the literature [360].”
A pooled RP/SP mode, route and destination choice model to investigate mode and user-type effects in the value of travel time savings (2019, background): “…order to obtain meaningful WTP estimates, the travel cost parameter is restricted to be negative, such8 that ψ̃n,t is strictly positive (see e.g. Hess and Rose (2012)): It follows a log-normal mixture distribution9 according to a fixed parameter βcost, a vector of socio-economic…”
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. (2016, unknown): “Although historically these two problems have been considered distinct issues of the conditional logit model, more recent discussions acknowledge that the two problems are related [49].”
Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software (2017, background): “model that could be chosen, and it is not without its critics [26], although these criticisms are more about interpretation than the model itself.”