Removing Batch Effects in Analysis of Expression Microarray Data: An Evaluation of Six Batch Adjustment Methods

By Chao Chen, Kay S. Grennan, J. Badner, Dandan Zhang, E. Gershon, Li Jin, Chunyu Liu. PLoS ONE, 2011

519 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The expression microarray is a frequently used approach to study gene expression on a genome-wide scale. However, the data produced by the thousands of microarray studies published annually are confounded by “batch effects,” the systematic error introduced when samples are processed in multiple batches. Although batch effects can be reduced by careful experimental design, they cannot be eliminated unless the whole study is done in a single batch. A number of programs are now available to adjust microarray data for batch effects prior to analysis. We systematically evaluated six of these programs using multiple measures of precision, accuracy and overall performance. ComBat, an Empirical Bayes method, outperformed the other five programs by most metrics. We also showed that it is essential to standardize expression data at the probe level when testing for correlation of expression profiles, due to a sizeable probe effect in microarray data that can inflate the correlation among replicates and unrelated samples.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf4ac8c588c71fd30892a6b5125dfc13a263dfb9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Paul Flicek
  2. Stephan Beck
  3. Daniel Rico
  4. Alfonso Valencia
  5. Oliver Stegle
  6. Roderic Guigó
  7. Charlotte Soneson
  8. Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis

In Molecular Biology

  1. Ann Nowé
  2. Laura Clarke
  3. Stephan Beck
  4. Hans Lehrach
  5. Daniel Rico
  6. Alfonso Valencia
  7. Oliver Stegle
  8. Steven P. Wilder

Citations in the corpus