Stress-driven versus strain-driven nonlocal integral model for elastic nano-beams
By G. Romano, Raffaele Barretta. 2017
338 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf37f0d896800a244b9cccfe96d5cc754e8bb579
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Materials Chemistry
- Raimondo Luciano
- Raffaele Barretta
- S. Ali Faghidian
- F. D. Sciarra
- G. Romano
- Marko Canadija
- F. Marotti de Sciarra
In Mechanics of Materials
- Raimondo Luciano
- Raffaele Barretta
- S. Ali Faghidian
- F. D. Sciarra
- G. Romano
- Marko Canadija
- F. Marotti de Sciarra
Citations in the corpus
- Stress-driven modeling of nonlocal thermoelastic behavior of nanobeams (2019, background): “Properties and merits of the stress-driven strategy in comparison with strain-driven formulations can be found in [26, 27].”
- Nonlocal elasticity in nanobeams: the stress-driven integral model (2017, background): “Consequently the nonlocal constitutive law tends to reproduce the local one, and so goes for the solution of the elastostatic problem, except for boundary effects due to boundedness of the structural domain [ a, b ] ( Romano & Barretta, 2017 ).”
- Longitudinal vibrations of nano-rods by stress-driven integral elasticity (2019, methodology): “As discussed in detail by Romano and Barretta [30], [31], adopting the following Helmholtz special bi-exponential kernel”