Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review.

By T. Cameron. Journal of Neurosurgery, 2004

773 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cell Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf2d94904f8cb9ee834286b8cdf7d5117536babb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

1. L. Manchikanti

Citations in the corpus

• EFNS guidelines on neurostimulation therapy for neuropathic pain (2007, neutral): “1%), and other minor hardware problems [20].”
• Interventional techniques: evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain. (2007, background): “In the United States, the primary indications for spinal cord stimulation are failed back surgery syndrome and complex regional pain syndromes type I and type II (22,29,56,67,1249-1253).”
• Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: A multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome (2007, background): “Several studies have shown that SCS is a safe procedure with a reported risk of generally minor and correctable complications in 20–75% of patients (Cameron, 2004; Turner et al., 2004; Kumar et al., 2006).”