Modelling stiffness of polymer/clay nanocomposites
By K. Hbaieb, Q. X. Wang, Y. Chia, B. Cotterell. 2007
182 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Polymers and Plastics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf2062f920fe387f66573cf8bda75ca8eee3240b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- Xiaoying Zhuang
- Timon Rabczuk
- Khader M. Hamdia
- Mohammad Silani
- Pengfei He
- F. Gordaninejad
- R. Gibson
- Stéphane P.A. Bordas
In Polymers and Plastics
Citations in the corpus
- Modeling of two-phase random composite materials by finite element, Mori–Tanaka and strong contrast methods (2013, unknown): “[21] has shown that in the case of randomly distributed clay particles, 2D finite element models considerably underestimate the predictions by 3D models.”
- Energy absorption capability of nanocomposites: A review (2009, background): “In addition, many other useful results on the calculation of effective modulus [167,168,161,169] and stress distributions”
- Stochastic analysis of the fracture toughness of polymeric nanoparticle composites using polynomial chaos expansions (2017, background): “Instead, numerous numerical studies have been documented in the literature that simulate and predict the mechanical behavior of nanocomposites such as; polymer/nanoclay (Hbaieb et al. 2007; Scocchi et al. 2007; Silani et al. 2014), carbon nanotubes (Bhuiyan et al.”