Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

By V. Ficarra, G. Novara, W. Artibani, A. Cestari, A. Galfano, M. Graefen, G. Guazzoni, B. Guillonneau, M. Menon, F. Montorsi and 3 more. European Urology, 2009

1,019 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Urology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf0a3228a18f69cf72198fe2ae966da596924899

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

1. A. Heidenreich
2. Michel Bolla
3. N. Mottet
4. J. Bellmunt
5. V. Matveev
6. Steven Joniau
7. F. Zattoni
8. Thomas Wiegel

Citations in the corpus

• Guidelines on Prostate Cancer (2013, methodology): “however, long-term oncological outcomes are still unavailable (19).”
• Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. (2012, methodology): “Mature laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) series showed 12-mo urinary continence recovery ranging from 66% to 95%, and a cumulative analysis of available comparative studies showed overlapping results in comparison with RRP [6].”
• Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. (2012, methodology): “Similar ranges of outcomes from 42% to 76% were reported after nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) [8].”