The changing importance of white women's economic prospects for assortative mating

By Megan Sweeney, Maria Cancian. 2004

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ceed3ad0f88d9188775c09703c3a6ccda170d50c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Christine R Schwartz
2. R. Mare
3. Sean F. Reardon
4. Leire Salazar
5. R. Breen

In Gender Studies

1. Christine R Schwartz
2. Nicole M. Stephens
3. Michael W. Kraus
4. R. Mare
5. Sean F. Reardon
6. Leire Salazar
7. R. Breen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Michael W. Kraus
2. Nicole M. Stephens
3. Christine R Schwartz
4. R. Mare
5. Jacinth J. X. Tan
6. Sean F. Reardon
7. Dacher Keltner
8. A. S. R. Manstead

Citations in the corpus

• Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003 (2005, background): “and high-earning men may be more likely to pair with high-earning women than in the past ( Sweeney and Cancian 2004 ).”
• A Road Map for an Emerging Psychology of Social Class (2012, background): “For example, consider that people tend to live in neighborhoods, attend schools (Kusserow, 2004; Lareau, 2003; Nisbett, 2009), work together with (Argyle, 1994), and date and marry individuals from similar social class backgrounds (Sweeney & Cancian, 2004).”