Practical and empirical identifiability of hybrid discrete choice models

65 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Analysis of mode choice for intercity travel: Application of a hybrid choice model to two distinct US corridors (2018, methodology): “Substantial efforts have also gone into improved estimation techniques for the model and proper identification (Bhat & Dubey, 2014; Daziano, 2015; Raveau et al., 2012; Vij & Walker, 2014).”
Social Norms, Morals and Self-interest as Determinants of Pro-environment Behaviours: The Case of Household Recycling (2014, methodology): “Raveau et al. (2012) argue that normalizing variances leads to smaller bias, and this is the approach we adopt here.”
About attitudes and perceptions: finding the proper way to consider latent variables in discrete choice models (2015, unknown): “However, empirical evidence sustains the thesis that the sequential estimation produces no major discrepancies regarding the ratios between the estimated parameters and, therefore, the marginal rates of substitution (Raveau et al. 2010; Bahamonde-Birke et al. 2010).”