Introspection and subliminal perception
By Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy, Morten Storm Overgaard. 2004
488 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ced15378d1cc03be2e32519e5036c26ba7637744
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
Citations in the corpus
- How can we measure awareness? An overview of current methods (2015, background): “Post-decision wagering (PDW) (Ruffman et al. 2001; Persaud et al. 2007)—this method is essentially aimed at eliminating the incentive-related exhaustiveness issues of PAS and CR, by having people wager money on their response.”
- How Bayesian statistics are needed to determine whether mental states are unconscious (2015, unknown): “That is, could we specify predictions in a way suitable for many situations psychologists might come across, so that it could be used generally, and is hence “objective”? Rouder et al. (2009) provided such a default Bayes factor calculator (see <http://pcl.”
- Guest Editors’ Introduction (2014, background): “Recent findings support the notion of perception without conscious awareness, and oppose the intuitive notion that consciousness is necessary for perception (Ramsoy & Overgaard, 2004).”
- Neural correlates of perceptual consciousness from within: A narrative review of human intracranial research (2025, unknown): “They then rated its visibility on the perceptual awareness scale, a four-point scale that has been found to offer a more appropriate measure of perceptual consciousness than binary scales ( Ramsøy and Overgaard, 2004 ; Sandberg et al., 2010 ).”