Culture–gene coevolution of individualism–collectivism and the serotonin transporter gene

By Joan Y. Chiao, Katherine D. Blizinsky. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences, 2009

594 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Culture–gene coevolutionary theory posits that cultural values have evolved, are adaptive and influence the social and physical environments under which genetic selection operates. Here, we examined the association between cultural values of individualism–collectivism and allelic frequency of the serotonin transporter functional polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) as well as the role this culture–gene association may play in explaining global variability in prevalence of pathogens and affective disorders. We found evidence that collectivistic cultures were significantly more likely to comprise individuals carrying the short (S) allele of the 5-HTTLPR across 29 nations. Results further show that historical pathogen prevalence predicts cultural variability in individualism–collectivism owing to genetic selection of the S allele. Additionally, cultural values and frequency of S allele carriers negatively predict global prevalence of anxiety and mood disorder. Finally, mediation analyses further indicate that increased frequency of S allele carriers predicted decreased anxiety and mood disorder prevalence owing to increased collectivistic cultural values. Taken together, our findings suggest culture–gene coevolution between allelic frequency of 5-HTTLPR and cultural values of individualism–collectivism and support the notion that cultural values buffer genetically susceptible populations from increased prevalence of affective disorders. Implications of the current findings for understanding culture–gene coevolution of human brain and behaviour as well as how this coevolutionary process may contribute to global variation in pathogen prevalence and epidemiology of affective disorders, such as anxiety and depression, are discussed.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cecb1523e75a5b856e8be13ebd489cb44bb58453

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Kristen A. Lindquist
  2. Lisa Feldman Barrett
  3. Hedy Kober
  4. Tor D. Wager
  5. Eliza Bliss-Moreau
  6. Michael A. McDaniel
  7. Natalie J. Shook
  8. John A. Terrizzi

In Social Psychology

  1. Kristen A. Lindquist
  2. Lisa Feldman Barrett
  3. Tor D. Wager
  4. Hedy Kober
  5. Eliza Bliss-Moreau
  6. Michael A. McDaniel
  7. Natalie J. Shook
  8. John A. Terrizzi

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Eliza Bliss-Moreau
  2. Hedy Kober
  3. Lisa Feldman Barrett
  4. Michael A. McDaniel
  5. Tor D. Wager
  6. Kristen A. Lindquist
  7. Natalie J. Shook
  8. John A. Terrizzi

Citations in the corpus