Kernel-Based Weighted Multi-view Clustering
By Grigorios Tzortzis, Aristidis C. Likas. 2012
255 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Citations in the corpus
- Generalized Latent Multi-View Subspace Clustering (2020, unknown): “Based on MKL, [33] further proposes to automatically weight different views.”
- A Survey on Multi-View Clustering (2017, unknown): “To make a full use of all views, the weighted combination K = ∑m v=1 w p vK , wv ≥ 0, ∑m v=1 wv = 1, p ≥ 1 will be used in kernel k-means (24) and spectral clustering (8) to obtain the corresponding multiview kernel k-means and multi-view spectral clustering [41].”
- Diversity-induced Multi-view Subspace Clustering (2015, background): “Nevertheless, the main limitation of the existing methods [8, 9, 12, 16, 17, 24, 25] is that they could not guarantee the complementarity across different similarity matrices corresponding to different views.”
- On Unifying Multi-view Self-Representations for Clustering by Tensor Multi-rank Minimization (2016, background): “The aim is to learn the weighted combination of these kernel and the partitioni ng simultaneously [7].”
- Multi-view clustering: A survey (2018, unknown): “[51], where the weights to the kernels were assigned according to the information quality of the corresponding views.”
- Multi-view learning overview: Recent progress and new challenges (2017, background): “Corel Images Dataset7 Corel images dataset [124] consists of 34 categories, each with 100 images.”
- Latent Multi-view Subspace Clustering (2017, methodology): “Furthermore, the researchers in [25] proposed a more general way based on MKL to learn the weights of different kernels.”
- GMC: Graph-Based Multi-View Clustering (2020, methodology): “The other related multi-view clustering methods can be roughly classified into three categories: co-training style clustering [19], [26], [27], [28], multi-kernel clustering [29], [30], [31], [32], and multi-view subspace clustering [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43].”
- Low-Rank Tensor Constrained Multiview Subspace Clustering (2015, background): “Instead of equally adding these kernels, views are expressed in terms of given kernel matrices and a weighted combination of these kernels is learned in parallel to the partitioning in [17].”