European Integration in the Euro Crisis: The Limits of Postfunctionalism

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Unexpected Winner of the Crisis: The European Commission’s Strengthened Role in Economic Governance (2014, background): “After what can be described as a ‘step change’ (Schimmelfennig 2014), it now features financial stability support with strong conditionality for troubled member states, a tighter grip on domestic economic policies, a clearer focus on competitiveness in the coordination of other national policies…”
Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration (2016, background): “With regard to EMU, a standard neofunctionalist account would suggest that functional spillovers from monetary union into adjacent fields such as fiscal policy and banking regulation have created incentives for member states to pursue deepening, and that supranational entrepreneurs and interest grou”
Building a hidden investment state? The European Investment Bank, national development banks and European economic governance (2019, background): “has again sparked the debate as to what extent the EU moves beyond this description and engages in a new wave of institution building, significantly furthering the integration process (Caporaso et al. 2015; Schimmelfennig 2014).”