Assessing the long‐term impact of Ranavirus infection in wild common frog populations
By A. Teacher, A. Cunningham, T. Garner. 2010
160 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce92f5dbfc10f69b6f84ca85d33dc587551add1e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- Immune Suppression by Neonicotinoid Insecticides at the Root of Global Wildlife Declines (2013, background): “In Animal Conservation, researchers reported that the rapidly spreading ranavirus “is killing common frogs in the UK in areas where it has never been seen before”.(34) Joseph Mendelson wrote recently:(35) “The reality of amphibian declines and extinctions has shifted the ecological baseline in so ma”
- Distribution and Host Range of Ranaviruses (2015, background): “While the outcome of infection varies among hosts and strains of ranaviruses, it is clear that ranaviruses have the potential to cause population declines and extinctions (Teacher et al. 2010 ; Price et al. 2014 ; Earl and Gray 2014 ).”
- Ranavirus Ecology and Evolution: From Epidemiology to Extinction (2015, background): “Again, ranaviruses in the UK appear to primarily affect adults (Cunningham et al. 1993 ; Teacher et al. 2010 ; Duffus et al. 2013 ).”
- Non-native aquatic animals introductions have driven disease emergence in Europe (2011, background): “Common frog mortalities in the UK and localised population declines (Teacher et al. 2010) New host”