Habitat use by an intertidal salt-marsh fish: trade-offs between predation and growth

By Patricia M. Halpin. 2000

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce91dcf13634c72319ffcdb6bf8cd698b8336d7a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

Quality of coastal and estuarine essential fish habitats: estimations based on the size of juvenile common sole (Solea solea L.) (2003, background): “(2) Predation pressure influences habitat choice for juvenile fish (Laegdsgaard and Johnson, 2001); if a predation refuge is available, habitat use increases independently from growth rate in this habitat ( Halpin, 2000 ).”
Deep danger: intra-specific predation risk influences habitat use and aggregation formation of juvenile lemon sharks Negaprion brevirostris (2012, background): “…gape-limited predators, such as teleost fishes, this pattern is particularly strong (Brose et al. 2006), and evidence from a number of marine fishes indicates that anti-predator behaviour (use of shallow water refuges) can be size-dependent (Halpin 2000, Linehan et al. 2001, Manderson et al. 2004).”
A coupled, two-dimensional hydrodynamic-marsh model with biological feedback (2016, background): “Introduction Coastal salt marsh systems provide intertidal habitats for many pecies (Halpin, 2000; Pennings and Bertness, 2001), many of hich (e.g., crabs and fish) have significant commercial imporance.”
Spatial patterns in diet and distribution of juveniles of four fish species in Delaware Bay marsh creeks: factors influencing fish abundance (2004, background): “…nursery habitats interact, so that a habitat that provides enhanced values of one attribute (e.g. feeding success) may offer diminished values of another (e.g. predation refuge) and may not necessarily confer higher fitness (Boesch & Turner 1984, Werner & Hall 1988, Sogard 1992, 1994, Halpin 2000).”
The role of seagrass meadows, mangrove forests, salt marshes and reed beds as nursery areas and food sources for fishes in estuaries (2017, background): “A similar study by Halpin (2000) compared growth rates and predation rates on F. heteroclitus in Rhode Island (USA) salt marshes and immediately outside the marshes.”
The food limitation hypothesis for juvenile marine fish (2015, result): “In accordance with laboratory studies, field 1 experiments confirm that, in spite of a trade-off with other factors and especially the threat of 2 predation (Sogard 1992, Halpin 2000), food availability on the nursery ground is a primary 3 driver of habitat choice and juvenile fitness.”
Predator distribution and habitat patch area determine predation rates on Age-0 juvenile cod Gadus spp. (2003, methodology): “The technique has its detractors (e.g. Halpin 2000, Kneib & Scheele 2000, Peterson & Black 1994) who have suggested that artifacts confound estimates of predation risk.”
Diel movements of fishes linked to benthic seascape structure in a Caribbean coral reef ecosystem (2011, background): “…observations (Friedlander & Parrish 1998, Nagelker - ken et al. 2000, Mumby et al. 2004), from extractive net and trap sampling (e.g. Beets & Friedlander 1998, Halpin 2000, Hammerschlag & Serafy 2010), and chemical isotope signatures (Kieckbusch et al. 2004, Nagelkerken & van der Velde 2004).”
European intertidal marshes: a review of their habitat functioning and value for aquatic organisms (2006, background): “Both growth rate and predation risk influenced habitat use by Fundulus heteroclitus in intertidal salt marshes (Halpin 2000).”