Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements

By John B. Torous, J. Nicholas, M. Larsen, J. Firth, Helen Christensen. Evidence Based Journals, 2018

700 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The potential of smartphone apps to improve quality and increase access to mental health care is increasingly clear. Yet even in the current global mental health crisis, real-world uptake of smartphone apps by clinics or consumers remains low. To understand this dichotomy, this paper reviews current challenges surrounding user engagement with mental health smartphone apps. While smartphone engagement metrics and reporting remains heterogeneous in the literature, focusing on themes offers a framework to identify underlying trends. These themes suggest that apps are not designed with service users in mind, do not solve problems users care most about, do not respect privacy, are not seen as trustworthy and are unhelpful in emergencies. Respecting these current issues surrounding mental health app engagement, we propose several solutions and highlight successful examples of mental health apps with high engagement. Further research is necessary to better characterise engagement with mental health apps and identify best practices for design, testing and implementation.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce7cd9833e3002b4db6544c8eb1881fd89a14f4d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. Robb Willer

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Lyle Ungar
  2. H. A. Schwartz
  3. Johannes C. Eichstaedt
  4. João Sedoc
  5. Robb Willer
  6. David B. Yaden
  7. Cameron Anderson
  8. Dacher Keltner

Citations in the corpus