Some alternative strategies to Moors’ model in randomized response sampling

By Sarjinder Singh, R. Singh, N. Mangat. 2000

54 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Unbiased estimators of mean, variance and sensitivity level for quantitative characteristics in finite population sampling (2010, background): “In recent years, many improvements and enhancements have significantly increased the value and acceptance of the RR approaches, see Bhargava and Singh (2000); Chua and Tsui (2000); Padmawar and Vijayan (2000); Singh et al. (2000, 2001) ; Chaudhuri (2001); Bar-Lev et al. (2004); Chaudhuri (2004) and”
A mixed randomized response model (2005, methodology): “Singh et al. (2000)also proposed two different models as alternatives for the Moors model, but the proposed models used simple random sampling without replacement which led to a high-cost survey compared with the Moors model using simple random sampling with replacement.”