Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations
By Francisco Chiclana, Francisco Herrera, Enrique Herrera-Viedma. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 2001
542 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce583eca7b4ec66a141d9573046da224ca33a7f3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Enrique Herrera-Viedma
- Zeshui Xu
- Francisco Herrera
- Francisco Chiclana
- Sergio Alonso
- Yucheng Dong
- Huchang Liao
- Luis Martínez-López
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Zeshui Xu
- Guiwu Wei
- Ronald R. Yager
- Huchang Liao
- Francisco Herrera
- Nian Zhang
- Francisco Chiclana
- Enrique Herrera-Viedma
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Zeshui Xu
- Enrique Herrera-Viedma
- Francisco Herrera
- Francisco Chiclana
- Yucheng Dong
- Huchang Liao
- Sergio Alonso
- Guiwu Wei
Citations in the corpus
- A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures (2002, methodology): “As we have shown in [5], when the information is consistent we obtain the same ordered vector of alternatives using dominance degree and nondominance degree, which are independent of the linguistic quantifier used.”
- Induced uncertain linguistic OWA operators applied to group decision making (2006, methodology): “; nÞ by using (1), for simplicity, let pij 1⁄4 pð~si P~sjÞ, then, we develop a complementary matrix [29–36] as”
- Cardinal Consistency of Reciprocal Preference Relations: A Characterization of Multiplicative Transitivity (2009, methodology): “An example of this inappropriateness is the additive transitivity property that, although equivalent to Saaty’s consistency property for multiplicative preference relations [6], [31], is in conflict with the [0, 1] scale used for providing the preference values.”
- Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (2014, background): “Definition 3 [23], [40]–[42]: A fuzzy preference relation Δ on the set X = {x1 , x2 , .”
- Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP (2008, unknown): “Proposition 2 .1 [9] [17] [24] [27] [28] .”
- An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations (2006, unknown): “.,dn} be the set of DMs.”
- Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations (2004, background): “Keywords: decision making, fuzzy preference relations, multiplicative preference relations, consistency, reciprocity.”
- Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations (2001, methodology): “As we pointed out at the beginning, preference relation is the most common representation of information used in MPDM problems because it is a useful tool in modelling decision processes, above all when we want to aggregate experts’ preferences into group preferences [3,5, 6 ,9,10,16,18,19,23,24].”
- Group Decision-Making Model With Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations Based on Additive Consistency (2007, background): “In fact, this is an issue that recently has attracted the attention of many researchers in the area of GDM, and as a result different approaches to integrating different preference representation formats have been proposed [1], [2], [8], [13], [40], [41].”
- Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method (2010, background): “, multiplicative preference relations [26,37,42] and fuzzy preference relations [11,12,20,22,40]).”
- A web based consensus support system for group decision making problems and incomplete preferences (2010, methodology): “In [9], another preference representation format (multiplicative preference relations) was incorporated to the previous model to enhance it.”
- Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges (2018, background): “In particular, when dealing with additive preference relations, an approach based on dominance and non-dominance degrees of alternatives is often adopted [51,52].”