Economic integration agreements and the margins of international trade

By S. Baier, J. Bergstrand, Michael Feng. 2014

456 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce4b36689d602db3da54143f4c55328a557cfaed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Morin
2. Andreas Dür
3. Leonardo Baccini
4. Manfred Elsig
5. Jakob Schwab
6. Axel Berger
7. Clara Brandi
8. Lisa Lechner

In Strategy and Management

1. Leonardo Baccini
2. Jakob Schwab
3. Axel Berger
4. J. Morin
5. Andreas Dür
6. Manfred Elsig
7. Clara Brandi

Citations in the corpus

• The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset (2013, background): “More recently, attempts have been made to differentiate the effects by types of trade agreements (partial scope agreements vs. free trade agreements vs. customs unions, see Baier et al. 2011).”
• Do environmental provisions in trade agreements make exports from developing countries greener? (2020, background): “Existing studies indicate that such deep PTAs tend to generate more trade than shallower agreements (Baier et al., 2014; Dür et al., 2014; Mattoo et al., 2017).”
• The cost of non-Europe, revisited* (2019, unknown): “The preferred EU effects estimate of Baier et al. (2014) and Eicher and Henn (2011) are other examples finding that the deep integration agreements such as the EU have a much larger trade impact than standard RTAs.”
• Do Trade Agreements Stimulate International Trade Differently? Evidence from 296 Trade Agreements (2013, unknown): “Baier et al. (2014) demonstrate that the extent to which TAs affect trade volumes can be related to the ‘type’ of agreement.”