Ocean circulation and sea ice distribution in a finite element global sea ice–ocean model

By R. Timmermann, Sergey Danilov, J. Schröter, C. Böning, D. Sidorenko, K. Rollenhagen. 2009

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce418942d0042d2419f19bd89edc55b28d62bf46

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. D. Sidorenko
2. J. Schröter
3. Wolfgang Hiller
4. Qiang Wang
5. Martin Losch
6. T. Jung
7. Sergey Danilov
8. Edgar L. Andreas

In Global and Planetary Change

1. J. Schröter
2. Wolfgang Hiller
3. Martin Losch
4. T. Jung
5. Edgar L. Andreas
6. T. Semmler
7. Michael Dowd

In Oceanography

1. J. Schröter
2. Wolfgang Hiller
3. Martin Losch
4. Michael Dowd

Citations in the corpus

• Towards multi-resolution global climate modeling with ECHAM6–FESOM. Part I: model formulation and mean climate (2015, methodology): “In this study, the presently most advanced and well tested global multi-resolution sea ice-ocean model—the Finite Element Sea Ice-Ocean Model (FESOM; Danilov et al. 2004; Wang et al. 2008, 2013; Timmermann et al. 2009)—is coupled to the atmospheric model ECHAM6.”
• A parametrization, based on sea ice morphology, of the neutral atmospheric drag coefficients for weather prediction and climate models (2012, background): “However, in most state-of-the-art climate and sea ice models (e.g., ECHAM: Roeckner et al., 2003; FESOM: Timmermann et al., 2009]), the variability of sea ice surface roughness is not taken into account and surface roughness does not depend on sea ice characteristics.”