The science of well-being

By E. Diener. 2009

432 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce4021e27a451885e3295ac82b3e1ad049c997ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Restoration in Urban Spaces (2016, background): “In turn, life satisfaction is among the most common measures of psychological well-being or absence of stress (Diener, 2009; McDowell, 2006).”
Eudaimonic conceptions of well-being, meaning in life, and self-reported well-being: Initial test of a mediational model (2011, neutral): “This alternative causal model is certainly plausible in light of previous research indicating that evaluations of well-being are associated with aspects of personality (e.g., extroversion) and are thus, to some degree, heritable (see Lucas & Diener, 2009).”
Travel and Subjective Well-Being: A Focus on Findings, Methods and Future Research Needs (2013, methodology): “Diener et al. (2010) constructed a Flourishing Scale based upon five dimensions: social relationships; having a purposeful and meaningful life; self-respect and optimism; feelings of competence and engagement; and interest in daily activities.”
Subjective Well-Being: A General Overview (2009, background): “Assessing Well-Being: The Collected Works of Ed Diener (2009) provides an in-depth discussion of the construction, validity, and reliability of many of the well-being measures.”
Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing (2012, background): “Philosophers adopting the hedonic perspective generally equated wellbeing with the positive emotional states that accompany satisfaction of desire; therefore experiences of pleasure, carefreeness, and enjoyment were considered reflective of wellbeing (Diener, 2009).”