WHY SHORT‐TERM EXPERIMENTS MAY NOT ALLOW LONG‐TERM PREDICTIONS ABOUT INTRAGUILD PREDATION

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Trophic supplements to intraguild predation (2007, background): “Briggs and Borer (2005) also noted the potential for an influx of individuals into the IG prey population to facilitate predator coexistence, which is consistent with the results of the constant supplement model.”
Stability and persistence of food webs with omnivory: Is there a general pattern? (2012, background): “Although the shortterm studies reviewed in Janssen et al. (2007) are often difficult to extrapolate to long-term dynamics (Briggs and Borer 2005), the reduction in the species’ interaction strengths suggests the importance of spatial heterogeneity for persistence of omnivorous systems.”
The Influence of Intraguild Predation on the Suppression of a Shared Prey Population: An Empirical Reassessment (2006, background): “The first is that there is a profound disconnect between the time frames of the empirical and the theoretical work: while the theory has been almost universally concerned with longterm equilibrium conditions, the empirical work has been almost entirely very shortterm (Venzon et al. 2001, Hastings 20”
INTRAGUILD PREDATION USUALLY DOES NOT DISRUPT BIOLOGICAL CONTROL (2006, background): “Such dynamics may be distinctly different from long-term dynamics ( Briggs and Borer, 2005 ).”