Constraining the population of cosmic ray protons in cooling flow clusters with γ-ray and radio observations: Are radio mini-halos of hadronic origin?

By C. Pfrommer, Torsten A. Ensslin. 2003

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We wish to constrain the cosmic-ray proton (CRp) population in galaxy clusters. By hadronic interactions with the thermal gas of the intra-cluster medium (ICM), the CRp produce γ -rays for which we develop an analytic formalism to deduce their spectral distribution. Assuming the CRp-to-thermal energy density ratio $X_\mathrm{CRp}$ and the CRp spectral index to be spatially constant, we derive an analytic relation between the γ -ray and bolometric X-ray fluxes, $\mathcal{F}_{\gamma}$ and $F_\mathrm{X}$. Based on our relation, we compile a sample of suitable clusters which are promising candidates for future detection of γ -rays resulting from hadronic CRp interactions. Comparing to EGRET upper limits, we constrain the CRp population in the cooling flow clusters Perseus and Virgo to $X_\mathrm{CRp} κ , we find the central CRp injection luminosity of M 87 to be limited to $ 10^{43}\mbox{ erg s}^{-1} \, \kappa/(10^{29} \mbox{ cm}^{2}\mbox{ s}^{-1})$. The synchrotron emission from secondary electrons generated in CRp hadronic interactions allows even tighter limits to be placed on the CRp population using radio observations. We obtain excellent agreement between the observed and theoretical radio brightness profiles for Perseus, but not for Coma without a radially increasing CRp-to-thermal energy density profile. Since the CRp and magnetic energy densities necessary to reproduce the observed radio flux are very plausible, we propose synchrotron emission from secondary electrons as an attractive explanation of the radio mini-halos found in cooling flow clusters. This model can be tested with future sensitive γ -ray observations of the accompanying $\pi^0$-decays. We identify Perseus (A 426), Virgo, Ophiuchus, and Coma (A 1656) as the most promising candidate clusters for such observations.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce279454373ff9932be32efea9f07b4059971ddd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Volker Springel
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. M. Zaldarriaga
  7. C. Pfrommer
  8. A. Strong

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Volker Springel
  2. A. Strong
  3. E. Orlando
  4. Anna Franckowiak
  5. C. Pfrommer
  6. Torsten A. Ensslin
  7. Simon D. M. White
  8. I. Grenier

Citations in the corpus