Examining the relationship between default risk and efficiency in Islamic and conventional banks

By Momna Saeed, Marwan Izzeldin. 2016

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Islamic Banking and Finance: Recent Empirical Literature and Directions for Future Research (2015, unknown): “1 PSLB versus non-PSLB Types of Finance The theory of Islamic banking, emanating from Uzair (1978) conceptualizes an Islamic financial intermediary as a double Mudharabah (quasi-equity PSLB) contract.”
Bank overall financial strength: Islamic versus conventional banks (2017, background): “However, Islamic banks are not allowed to invest in such interest-bearing securities, and they can only invest in Islamic bonds (i.e. Sukuk).1 At the same time, this means that Islamic banks lack liquid securities on the asset side (Saeed and Izzeldin, 2016).”
Finance-Growth Nexus and Dual-Banking Systems: Relative Importance of Islamic Banks (2016, unknown): “…banking (Ongena and Şendeniz-Yüncü, 2011), business models (Beck et al., 2013), risk (Abedifar, et al., 2013), efficiency (Johnes et al., 2014; Saeed and Izzeldin, 2014), loan default rates (Baele et al., 2014), mutual funds (Abdelsalam et al., 2014) and valuation (Elnahass, et al., 2014) 1 .”