Account episodes in family discourse: the making of morality in everyday interaction

By L. Sterponi. 2003

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce0a8a9923189fec743ffbf10e47b18dda68bdd6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Galina B. Bolden
2. A. Peräkylä
3. Jeffrey D. Robinson
4. Melisa Stevanovic
5. Daniel M. K. Lam

In Language and Linguistics

1. Galina B. Bolden
2. A. Peräkylä
3. Melisa Stevanovic
4. Jeffrey D. Robinson
5. Daniel M. K. Lam
6. Maurice Nevile
7. E. Weiste

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Galina B. Bolden
2. A. Peräkylä
3. Jeffrey D. Robinson
4. Melisa Stevanovic
5. Daniel M. K. Lam
6. Maurice Nevile

Citations in the corpus

• Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide (2012, background): “Sterponi (2003), then again, had recourse to the notion of deontics, in passing, when commenting on a parent’s instructions to his child (2003, p. 83), and Zinken and Ogiermann (2011) make use of it in analysing deontic modal constructions in directives, again in family talk.1 We might fill in more…”
• Soliciting Accounts With Why-Interrogatives in Conversation (2011, background): “In some languages, such as German (Egbert & Vöge, 2008) and Italian (Sterponi, 2005), there are different lexical forms for why and thus for why-interrogatives (e.g., weiso and warum in German and perché and come mai in Italian).”