Phase development in normal and ultra high performance cementitious systems by quantitative X-ray analysis and thermoanalytical methods

By A. Korpa, T. Kowald, R. Trettin. 2009

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cde0e984d63a9ff7d06c6fbcc418cb019a8f6f7f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. C. Shi
2. S. Singh
3. Onkareshwar Mishra
4. Zemei Wu
5. I. Low
6. A. Hakamy
7. Dehui Wang
8. Linmei Wu

In Materials Chemistry

1. I. Low
2. A. Hakamy
3. S. Singh
4. Onkareshwar Mishra
5. C. Shi
6. Faiz Shaikh
7. J. Provis

Citations in the corpus

• The hydration and microstructure of ultra high-strength concrete with cement–silica fume–slag binder (2015, background): “The crystalline phase content in the ordinary concrete was considerably higher than that in UHPC [6].”
• Characteristics of nanoclay and calcined nanoclay-cement nanocomposites (2015, methodology): “[32], in which they reported that this discrepancy could be attributed to the possible error sources of each method itself that were difficult to quantify.”
• An overview of microstructural and material properties of ultra-high-performance concrete (2019, background): “Moreover, the addition of silica fume with optimum content of 10–20% enhances the workability [76], whereas RHA decreases the workability due to its water absorbing nature [77].”
• Rietveld Quantitative Phase Analysis of OPC Clinkers, Cements and Hydration Products (2012, unknown): “Single phases (modelling) Binary (f.i. OPC + FA) Ternary (f.i. OPC + FA + CC or: OPC + BFS + FA)”