Effect of Specimen Geometry and Testing Method on Mixed Mode I–II Fracture Toughness of a Limestone Rock from Saudi Arabia
By K. Khan, N. Al-Shayea. 2000
240 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Mechanics of Materials, Ocean Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cdda7af9c48c49d5463dba6f4e0efa911a2980ff
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Mechanics of Materials
In Ocean Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- A Further Improved Maximum Tangential Stress Criterion for Assessing Mode I Fracture of Rocks Considering Non-singular Stress Terms of the Williams Expansion (2018, methodology): “For example, Khan and Al-Shayea (2000) have conducted fracture tests using 49-mm-radius CSTBD and SCB specimens of Saudi Arabian limestone, which has a critical distance of 5.2 mm (i.e., rc = 0.106R) (Ayatollahi and Aliha 2008); if the specimens have the same geometries and loading configurations…”
- Size and Geometry Effects on Rock Fracture Toughness: Mode I Fracture (2014, background): “A number of studies have also been carried out theoretically and experimentally to assess the geometry effects on mode I fracture toughness, such as those reported by Aliha et al. (2010), Khan and Al-Shayea (2000), Chao et al. (2001), and Rocco et al. (1999).”
- On determination of mode II fracture toughness using semi-circular bend specimen (2006, background): “The disc type test specimens such as the centrally cracked Brazilian disc (CCBD) specimen subjected to a diametral compressive load and the semi-circular specimen under three-point bending (SCB specimen) have been among favorite specimens for fracture tests in brittle materials (e.g. Awaji and Sato,”
- Typical Upper Bound–Lower Bound Mixed Mode Fracture Resistance Envelopes for Rock Material (2011, methodology): “The mixed mode fracture toughness of a soft limestone has been investigated by Khan and Al-Shayea (2000) and Al-Shayea (2005) using the straight cracked BD configuration.”
- Effects of temperature and confining pressure on mixed-mode (I–II) and mode II fracture toughness of Kimachi sandstone (2014, background): “mode I and mode II) and pure mode II fracture toughness of rock [16–23].”
- Application of Cracked Triangular Specimen Subjected to Three-Point Bending for Investigating Fracture Behavior of Rock Materials (2013, background): “The centrally cracked Brazilian disk specimen subjected to diametral compressive load (Awaji and Sato 1978; Atkinson et al. 1982; Shetty et al. 1987; Khan and Al-Shayea 2000; Chang et al. 2002; Aliha et al. 2006; Ayatollahi and Aliha 2008a, 2009), the single edge cracked rectangular beam subjected…”
- On the link between fracture toughness, tensile strength, and fracture process zone in anisotropic rocks (2018, background): “…from different specimen types show that the measured fracture toughness is807 somewhat independent of the specimen thickness (Schmidt and Lutz, 1979; Laqueche et al., 1986;808 Kobayashi et al., 1986; Singh and Sun, 1990; Haberfield and Johnston, 1990; Lim et al., 1994;809 Khan and Al-Shayea, 2000).”
- Crack propagation trajectories for rocks under mixed mode I–II fracture (2005, background): “The (L) indicates limestone. for a notch length of 30 mm (i.e., a /R =0.3), Khan and Al-Shayea (2000) This made the crack tip to be a semicircular with a radius (q) equal to 0.125 mm.”
- Effects of strain rate on fracture toughness and energy release rate of gas shales (2017, unknown): “A fewof these suggested techniques are centrally cracked Brazilian discs (Atkinson et al., 1982; Chang et al., 2002; Khan and Al-Shayea, 2000; Shetty et al., 1987); single edge cracked rectangular plate subjected to four-point bending (He et al., 1990; Huang and Wang, 1985; Maccagno and Knott,…”